"Evaluation is not something that happens after a decision has been made. Rather, it is the basis for proposing change and its value lies in its ability to help clarify curriculum issues and enable teachers, as well as schools and systems, to make informed decisions. Due to the need, "This idea is one of the most important statements of Dr John and Bud, which illustrates the importance of the evaluation step in the curriculum.) Woods, J. D.,1988, P3)
Dr Wood then
highlights the suffering that the teacher receives at the evaluation step, for
example, the teacher's life is full, the barren time constraints will limit the
amount of effort that most teachers may make in evaluating and the teacher is
an important person in the learning process, their roles as a resident will be
limited. Curriculum and issues except through information regulation processes
and continuous discussion. There are three evaluation models, one is Davis, the
process model, the second, the class counting model, the third is the Eisner
expert model. (Woods, J. D.,1988)
And I think
Davis, the student model is one of the most important
models because it depends on the scientific method of thinking through the
question that the evaluation team should ask, who this evaluation is, and who
is the team that will perform the task that must be teachers, parents and
officials of the Ministry of Education who will be able to follow the
performance of teachers and performance of students for a certain period and
form subgroups of them. (Woods, J. D.,1988)
The second
model, which was agreed with Dr John Wood, is the sorting model, which depends
on the elimination of intentions from the curriculum, such as where students
come from, what they're inclinations and what they love, as well as teachers, and
Dr Wood points out the importance of meeting the evaluation team to develop a
joint plan and once the agreement begins to collect data, informal proposals,
and then begins the phase of evaluation and interpretation of these data, which
is the most important step in building the body of evaluation where residents
reach the results of the evaluation. Much better and honest. (Woods, J.
D.,1988)
And I think the
two models represent an organized action plan for the evaluation process and a
clear example of the teams that are evaluating schools did an example came to
our school a team called Elevation, which sends its final report to both
schools and the ministry, and it is fortunate that a team that applies global
standards in evaluation and curricula such as those we learn now at the
university comes to your school as if it were working only to catch mistakes,
so it would be The rating score is low.
Reference
Woods, J. D.
(1988). Curriculum Evaluation Models: Practical Applications for Teachers.
Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 13(1).
http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1988v13n2.1
No comments:
Post a Comment